Improving Barrett's Diagnosis and Surveillance Service at a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom

Introduction: Barrett's oesophagus is a well identified precursor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, with the risk of malignant transformation being 0.5% annually. It is therefore crucial that diagnosis and surveillance standards meet national guidelines. This audit was carried out to assess if our District General Hospital was meeting the standards set by the British Society of Gastroenterology with regards to Barrett's diagnosis and surveillance. Method(s): Data was collected looking at 143 OGDs carried out for Barrett's diagnosis and surveillance at a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom from 01/01/2018 to 30/06/2018. The OGD reports were compared against recommended national standards set by the British Society of Gastroenterology. A proforma was created and was put into use from August 2020. It was utilized by all endoscopists when carrying out OGDs for Barrett's diagnosis and surveillance. The proforma was added to the end of the hospital's standard endoscopy report. Following the intervention and use of the proforma, the second cycle of the audit was carried out looking at 58 OGDs completed between 05/08/2020-27/02/2021 to see if they met the standards set out by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The Barrett's surveillance service and the volume of OGDs carried out following the introduction of the proforma was affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Result(s): The first cycle of the audit found that only 34% of OGDs had a Prague classification documented correctly. 0% of OGDs had the correct biopsy protocol followed and 12.6% of endoscopies did not have any biopsies taken. 26% of patients had no follow up or surveillance endoscopy interval documented or organised. Following the intervention, it was found that 96% of endoscopies now had a Prague classification documented, an increase of 62%. There was a 65% increase in correct biopsy technique being followed and 100% of OGD reports now had surveillance interval documented if deemed appropriate. Conclusion(s): The audit clearly displays that following our intervention there was a significant improvement in the quality of Barrett's diagnostic and surveillance endoscopies, when compared to national guidelines. Given its potential for malignant transformation, correct surveillance is exceptionally important to improve patient care and reduce mortality. The introduction of a proforma drastically improved the standard of the service provided at our District General Hospital and is one that can be transferable to other hospitals.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Practice

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted profound shifts in the delivery of critical healthcare services. A mixed-methods study was conducted to explore the impact of the pandemic on Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) practice. The quantitative component involved a survey of CRNAs during the initial period of the pandemic to determine changes in practice and any relationship to removal of state and federal barriers. Approximately 16% of 2,202 responding CRNAs reported practice expansion beyond their normal responsibilities, primarily outside the operating room and involving tracheal intubation, ventilator management, arterial line placement, and central line placement. CRNAs were more likely to experience an expansion of practice in states affected by removal of regulatory barriers. However, respondents also reported missed opportunities to use the full expertise of CRNAs because of state and institutional restrictions. Findings from the qualitative component of this study are reported in a separate article.

From the Operating Room to the Front Lines: Shared Experiences of Nurse Anesthetists During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in severe health, economic, social, political, and cultural consequences while thrusting Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) at the forefront of battling an often invisible enemy. A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRNA practice. The purpose of the qualitative component of the study, a focused ethnography, was to use personal and group interviews to determine the shared experiences of CRNAs who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Six themes were identified: (1) CRNAs are part of the solution, (2) doing whatever it takes, (3) CRNAs are valued contributors, (4) removal of barriers promotes positive change, (5) trying times, and (6) expertise revealed. The quantitative component of the study will be discussed in a separate article.